Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Modares Journal of Medical Sciences, Pathobiology. 2007; 10 (2): 71-77
in English, Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-84574

ABSTRACT

22q11.2 chromosomal region is a hot spot for many cytogenetic rearrangements especially micro deletions which are responsible for DiGeorge and VeloCaridoFacial syndromes. The most characteristic sign in these patients is congenital cardiac conotruncal anomalies. The gold standard diagnostic test for these micro deletions is FISH [Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization]. However this diagnostic technique has some drawbacks such a high final cost and low sensitivity in smaller and uncommon micro deletions found in this region. The aim of this study was to introduce a less expensive and a priori more sensitive molecular method to help small and peripheral laboratories to find genetic causes of congenital heart diseases and DiGeorge syndrome. 10 patients with congenital conotruncal anomalies and symptoms of DiGeorge syndrome were included in this study. These patients had been analyzed by FISH probe TUPLE1 before the inclusion. 3 normal persons were included as normal controls for micro deletion region. Semi Quantitative Multiplex PCRs were designed based on known markers in and out of the region of interest. Results were analyzed by Total Lab software. 4 patients showed a decrease in gene dosage more than 60% compared to normal persons. FISH analysis found only one patient with micro deletion. The designed method based on semi quantitative PCR was able to find 4 patients [40%] with micro deletion in a population of 10 patients with congenital cardiac anomalies. This techniques was also able to find micro deletions in three FISH negative patients. Molecular diagnosis of micro deletions is supposed to be more sensitive than FISH in small micro deletions. This study confirms the presence of a typical deletions in Iranian patients and shows that the applied technique can detect some FISH negative patients. However further studies are needed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the mentioned molecular diagnosis. It seems that this can be used at least for the patients with typical phenotypic features of 22q11Ds and negative FISH results


Subject(s)
Humans , DiGeorge Syndrome/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Sequence Deletion
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL